Dating violence interview questions
British psychiatrist John Bowlby (left) developed it in the 1950s while working on the post-war orphan crisis. Bowlby believed that all infants would seek to stay close to parents, since such “ promotes survival.This would worry us all if we knew what it meant, because the other 45% suffer “insecure attachment.” That means almost half of us have trouble with committed relationships. If (like me) you’ve tried dating after divorce, it won’t surprise you that science shows almost half the adults out there can’t manage a secure, committed, relationship. And if 45% of us were “insecurely attached” in 1999, what’s the rate in 2017?[1, 2] This is because the attachment we had as kids continues all our lives, according to related research on over 10,500 adults during 1982-2009.  These are the “quiet blockbuster” results of two extended, linked studies. In the almost 20 years since, we’ve become an “e-society” with email, cell phones, texting and computers further trashing our ability to relate in person.So “surprisingly, Ainsworth found that infant responses to separation and reunion fell into three distinct, coherently organized patterns of attachment,” and added a third category: (C) Insecure Ambivalent, Main reports.[8, 9] By 1977 Ainsworth had developed an “American standard distribution” for infants of “about” (A) Insecure Avoidant 20%, (B) Secure 70%; and (C) Insecure Ambivalent 10%.By 1988, Strange Situation research using Ainsworth’s three categories had been done with 2,000 infant-parent pairs in 32 studies in 8 countries.Some countries varied, but global results averaged the same.
The ACE Study lists 10 such abuses, including traumas that happen to newborns (physical and emotional neglect).
“Ainsworth structured the Strange Situation to include three of Bowlby’s ‘natural clues to danger’…